No new movie today. I'm
still pissed off about Scary Movie 5.
On to the
rant!
The good news
is that Scary Movie 5 had a terrible
opening weekend. It only made $15.2
million as opposed to 42's $27.3
million. So, yay!
The bad news
is that enough people saw this film willingly that it made millions of dollars. I
understand that there is some extreme pressure to compete in Hollywood. More so than anywhere outside of politics, I
would wager. But what is wrong with the
system that someone could reasonably expect to use a film like this on a
resume? I like to imagine that the
writers did something similar to what occurred in the "Cartoon Wars"
episodes of South Park; except
instead of manatees, they all ate random words written on paper, shit on the
table and used that to build the script.
I'll admit,
despite such literal shit coming to theaters once in awhile, we are in an
absolute Golden Age of cinema. Don't let
anyone tell you different. With filming
methods becoming cheaper and easier to obtain, there are so many ways to create
movies that it feels like everyone is getting into it. Indie films are becoming just as accepted by
viewers as multi-million-dollar blockbusters.
So if a movie
can be made on the cheap and become critically acclaimed plus make a pile of money, shouldn't it be even more difficult to
greenlight a studio film? Shouldn't
someone have looked at the Scary Movie
franchise, noticed that A Haunted House
was coming out beforehand as was basically a Scary Movie film anyways, then nixed Scary Movie 5? Then maybe
murdered whoever brought up the idea?
Don't get me
wrong. I am not nearly as educated a
student of cinema as many of my friends or basically anyone who actually makes
a living out of watching film. I know
that there have always been shitty movies.
But it feels like they were fewer and farther between, just as often the
product of an overconfident director or a loss of control from the studio as it
was an ipso facto terrible film.
Plus, we have
always had 'bad' cinema due to time and money constraints. Roger Corman made a living out of pumping out
film after film for small audiences that just wanted to have a good time. Plan 9
From Outer Space, anyone?
But it feels
like Scary Movie 5 and recent films
like Jack and Jill are not only
terrible, but that they do not even have an audience to appeal to.
Especially with all the options
available to us nowadays! Why spend
$10-15 for a ticket to a movie that everyone who has seen it finds it abhorrent
when you can boot up Netflix or Hulu or Amazon Prime and watch known good
cinema? I understand the idea that
people want to take a risk or are just immensely hopeful/curious (see: half the
movies I watch), but Hollywood is not going to stop shitting on that table
until we as moviegoers stop handing them money for the next crapfest.
If someone
really, really felt that the next Scary
Movie film had to be made, then fine.
Give them a few digital cameras and just enough money to pay the
cast. Then force them to actually make a
good movie. Airplane did it. Not Another Teen Movie did it. Spoofs can be spot-on, relevant and fucking
hilarious. But when you're just ripping
off other, better movies in an attempt to cash in on trends, you're not making
a movie. You're making a shitty series
of scenes that would do just as well on a YouTube channel.
Stop it. Just stop it, Hollywood. Your head is so far up your ass at this point
that you think it's totally fine to go balls-deep in ours. That's not cool. Keep giving me the blockbusters, keep giving
me the thoughtful films, the experimental ones, the weird ones. I understand that a flop is inevitable, but
at least put some goddamn heart into it.
I'll forgive a flop with good intentions (John Carter) but I won't forgive any more shameless cash-ins (Grown-Ups). You can just sit there with your head up
your ass, making muffled noises about how to spoof the next big hit. I can't stop you, but I refuse to listen.
Hey, I really love the first Grown-Ups.
ReplyDelete...
I'm going to hell aren't I.
Probably, yes.
ReplyDelete