Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Paranormal Activity


There’s one thing that people need to take into account before badmouthing some types of cinema.  Sure, Paranormal Activity was a polarizing film, but how many people disliked it for the wrong reasons?  If you hate movies that are filmed ‘amateur’ or ‘found-footage’ style, then you really shouldn’t even be watching them. 
            Plus, you absolutely cannot be completely and totally disbelieving in the supernatural.  You don’t have to believe in the paranormal world, but you can’t not believe and expect to be affected at all.

            On to the review!

            In 2007, Paranormal Activity made a killing at the box office.  Throw in the fact that it was filmed for a few measly thousand, and Hollywood was looking at insane profits.  It made absolutely perfect sense to franchise it.  (Whether or not the law of diminishing returns has hit this particular franchise already is not the point of this discussion.  I could fill up several pages on that alone.)
            For those of you who are not familiar with the film, it follows a happy couple as they try to get to the bottom of what’s wrong with one of them.  Micah (Micah Sloat) is worried about his girlfriend Katie (Katie Featherston) and has purchased a camera in the hopes that he can get to the bottom of it.  Of course, they get far more than they bargained for.
            Like any good horror film, the situation unfolds slowly.  Little occurs in the first half of the movie, and Micah’s personal disbelief in the entire situation often diffuses what little tension there is.  A few things go bump in the night, but the film is mostly content to let you get comfortable with the house and the people who reside in it.
            Of course, the second half is a bit crazier, but the best part of Paranormal Activity is the fact that it never fully explains why Katie is being haunted.  Even after the movie ends, there are quite a few questions that are never answered.  (Again, the other movies don’t count just yet.  The less said about the ending of 3, the better.)
            I feel that this film also does something else that’s very important to a horror franchise: the ability to suspend disbelief.  By making it an amateur film, nobody has to worry about anyone acting ‘out of character’ because the characters simply act like themselves, going so far as to use their own first names in the film.
            While I personally loved the chills that this film gave me, I’m never surprised when others find it to be dull or boring.  For all of you out there who don’t like this or any other ‘supernatural’ or ‘possession’ movie out there, here’s a suggestion.  Stop watching them.  There will never be an amazing film, since Poltergeist and The Exorcist got there first.  There will still be good ones that drip out of Hollywood once in a while, but they won’t be game-changers.

            Speaking of firsts, next week I get to watch Poltergeist!

No comments:

Post a Comment